Geodocs.dev

AEO Content Checklist

ShareLinkedIn

Open this article in your favorite AI assistant for deeper analysis, summaries, or follow-up questions.

This checklist provides a quality gate for AEO-optimized content. Run through it before publishing any page targeting answer engine extraction.

🤖 AI SUMMARY

The AEO content checklist covers 7 categories with 35 checkpoints: answer block formatting, page structure, schema markup, voice optimization, content quality, technical accessibility, and extraction testing. Pages should score at least 28/35 before publication. Items marked with ⚡ are critical.

How to Use This Checklist

Score each item as pass (1) or fail (0). Target minimum 28/35. Items marked ⚡ are critical — failing any blocks publication.

1. Answer Block Formatting

  • [ ] ⚡ First paragraph answers the question — Core answer within first 150 words
  • [ ] ⚡ Answer is self-contained — Makes sense without surrounding context
  • [ ] Answer is 40–60 words for definitions, up to 150 for explanations
  • [ ] No unnecessary qualifiers — No "In this article, we'll explore..."
  • [ ] AI summary block present — Blockquote with 2–3 sentence summary

2. Page Structure

  • [ ] ⚡ H1 contains the target question or topic
  • [ ] H2 headings for each major section
  • [ ] One topic per page
  • [ ] Tables for comparisons — Not prose descriptions
  • [ ] Numbered lists for steps — Sequential instructions use ordered lists
  • [ ] Bulleted lists for features/items — Non-sequential items

3. Schema Markup

  • [ ] ⚡ Primary schema type implemented — TechArticle, FAQPage, or HowTo
  • [ ] FAQ schema for Q&A pairs
  • [ ] HowTo schema for tutorials
  • [ ] Author and organization data
  • [ ] Dates included — datePublished and dateModified

4. Voice Optimization

  • [ ] Sentences under 20 words in the answer block
  • [ ] No abbreviations without expansion
  • [ ] No visual references — No "as shown below"
  • [ ] Natural language — Reads like spoken English
  • [ ] Speakable selectors defined if using speakable schema

5. Content Quality

  • [ ] ⚡ Factually accurate — All claims verified
  • [ ] Sources cited — Data attributed to verifiable sources
  • [ ] Unique value — Original insights not available elsewhere
  • [ ] No filler content — Every paragraph adds value
  • [ ] Updated timestamp — Reflects most recent edit

6. Technical Accessibility

  • [ ] ⚡ Not blocked by robots.txt — AI crawlers can access
  • [ ] Clean HTML — Semantic elements
  • [ ] Fast load time — Under 3 seconds
  • [ ] Mobile responsive
  • [ ] Listed in llms.txt

7. Extraction Testing

  • [ ] ⚡ ChatGPT test — Content cited when asking target question
  • [ ] Perplexity test — Citation and accuracy verified
  • [ ] Google Featured Snippet — Position zero check
  • [ ] Extraction accuracy — Answer correctly represents content
  • [ ] Competitor comparison — Answer at least as clear as competitors

Scoring Summary

CategoryItemsCritical
Answer Block52
Page Structure61
Schema Markup51
Voice Optimization50
Content Quality51
Technical51
Testing51
Total357
ScoreStatusAction
32–35ExcellentPublish and monitor
28–31GoodPublish with minor fixes planned
21–27Needs workFix critical issues first
Below 21Not readyMajor restructuring required

FAQ

Do I need a perfect 35/35 score?

No. 28/35 is minimum viable quality. Focus on all 7 critical (⚡) items passing.

How often should I re-run on existing content?

Quarterly. Content quality degrades as information becomes outdated and AI systems evolve.

Topics
Auf dem Laufenden bleiben

GEO & AI-Such-Insights

Neue Artikel und Analysen. Kein Spam.